patching...
Breaking: Chester Police Seeking 'Forced Entry' Burglars »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Mendham Twp. Won’t Commit Feasibility Funds

Mendham Township Mayor Sam Tolley wants further details, more transparency and greater representation before asking the committee for $10,000.

 

The dream team of mayors aren’t going to get their fifth man without an entourage.

Mendham Township Mayor Sam Tolley said he would not commit $10,000 to help fund a feasibility study on altering the regional school system until he sees specifics on the scope of the study.

Members of the Mendham Township Committee also stated they wanted increased representation at further meetings and more involvement from the school boards.

 “I would want to know exactly what we would be studying before I commit dollars to it,” Mayor Tolley said.

On Feb. 23 Mayors Ken Short of Washington Township, Bill Cogger of Chester Township, Bob Davis of Chester Borough, and Neil Henry of Mendham Borough concluded a Department of Education presentation to the regional school district with an appeal for Tolley to join them in their meetings and in funding the feasibility study.

“We agreed they should have their [DOE] meeting first, now I am waiting for all the mayors to have a meeting,” Tolley said. “I think everyone on the committee would agree with me the different school boards need to become more involved and take a fuller role.”

 At the Feb. 28 Committee meeting, Tolley was asked by resident Jennifer Brauner why he wasn’t moving forward with the feasibility study. “If we are going to have a study, I need to know what the study is going to be on. I want an open process. I want people to know what is going on,” Tolley said. “And I want that collective group to order what that study would be on, but we need to have a consistent plan.”

Committee member Frank Cioppettini wanted more than just a plan in place. “The mayor and another member of our committee should attend these meetings because others have more than one person,” said the former mayor, who announced Washington Township has been sending more than one representative to the meetings.

Committee member Richard Merkt supported the idea of including the school leadership and more representation than the mayor alone, but also added that further questions should be asked of the other towns. “We need a threshold discussion with our sister towns,” Merkt said. “We need to see if they are willing to discuss a change to the funding formula.”

A clearer plan for the study, more representation at the meetings and better communication were all on the minds of the committee, as was transparency in the process. That is something resident Dennis Deegan agreed with.

“Given the magnitude of this particular item, ideally the five mayors should approach this the way this committee works. Anytime more than two members get together it has to be a public open meeting,” Deegan said. “All the meetings with the mayors should be open to the public. People interested in the process should be able to go and follow it.”

Related Topics: mendham township and mendham township committee

Domino

10:17 am on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Mayor Tolley, have you asked where the $50K Mr. Button claimed he was promised went to, or, like the rest of us, have you simply written this statement off knowing that Jamie Button was lying through his teeth? It is no wonder that the township committee feels it needs more representation on the West Morris board; the representative that we currently have is awful. The videos of board meetings show a very angry and ineffective individual sitting in the Mendham Township board seat.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Russ Crespolini

1:04 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Domino, quick point of clarification on something I might not have made clear. The Committee wants more representation on the meeting with the mayors. And they want more board of ed participation in the process. There was no talk of replacing seated board members. I am going to edit the story in a bit to see if I can make that clearer.

Thanks so much for taking the time to post and for reading!

Reply

Domino

1:31 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Russ: Thanks for your comment. So the Mendham Township Committee needs more than just their mayor to meet with the other 4 mayors? Why would they feel entitled to that? Is their opinion more valuable or important? Their board representative, Jamie Button, is a Harvard graduate (in case he hasn't reminded you lately). Isn't that enough? Sounds to me like they would like to micromanage and manipulate the process in order to get the result they want.

Reply

Leta

2:29 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

At the DOE meeting, I believe, the Mayors said the study would go through ALL scenarios that are available for the district, not just one. So not sure what Mayor Tolley is concerned about. If you want openness ALL possible changes should be reviewed. Yes, it would make sense that the school boards should be involved, asthey would be the ones voting on ANY change first. However, getting the facts of various scenarios should be first and foremost, thus the need for the Study.

Does any one know where the PowerPoint presentation can be found from the DOE meeting, was trying to find it? Thanks.

Reply

Claire

2:47 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Domino: I guess Mendham hasn't changed their stand since last summer. They want to bring in their own lawyers. see patch article http://longvalley.patch.com/articles/mayors-mendham-twp-stalling-education-process

Reply

Domino

2:59 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Claire, we need to differentiate Mendham Borough from Mendham Township. It is the Township that seems to be the cause of all of the angst here. Maybe the Township Committee needs to collectively resign from CBS before they can move forward.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Claire

5:10 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Domino: I stand corrected, yes it is the Mayor of MT, not MB, and also, I know not all the citizens of MT that agree with this too. It is a small group.

Patch_comments_icon

Russ Crespolini

5:19 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Hey guys,

I wanted to let you know that we were told the full powerpoint was being "cleaned up" and not available for release yet.

And again, just to clarify no one said anything about lawyers last night. They want more representation at the meetings with the mayors and they want more involvement from the school boards.

This is a complex issue and I want to make sure I am getting you guys the right information as clean as possible.

And as always, thanks for reading and for posting.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Claire

5:48 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Russ; I was just questioning who MT mayor wanted included and was referencing a past Patch article where it stated the prior meeting was cancelled due to the MT mayor coming with his Lawyer/confidant. I am just trying to get the facts out in the open because Domino's question led me to believe he was not aware of prior meetings.

So, what needs to be "Cleaned Up" in the powerpoint, I thought this was an open discussion.

Patch_comments_icon

Russ Crespolini

6:01 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

No no, I understand what you mean. Yes, there was an attorney brought to a previous meeting by the previous mayor of Mendham Township. That was not what they were talking about last night. I just don't want to confuse people further if that was what they were getting out of the story.

:-)

They have a fair idea of what they would like to see happen, so I suppose we will see what happens when they all next get together.

As for the presentation: From what I was told it was mostly formatting and style stuff to make it look a little cleaner and make it more accessible.

We also have video of the entire presentation I am working like crazy to get on the site, but its so long we are having technical difficulties with it. Hopefully I can iron them out in the next day or so!

Reply

John Doe

7:43 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

So, just to add some clarity from the meeting last night; I was at the meeting, and my understanding is that Mayor Tolley wants to meet with the other mayors so that he can report back to the Mendham Township Committee about the specific areas that will be studied. This makes perfect sense since he was not in the meetings when the other 4 mayors decided to move ahead with the study, and therefore had no input to the decision. If Mendham Township is supposed to be an equal partner in the study, then our representatives should also have a say in the focus of the study.

Keep in mind that Mendham Township operates a committee form of government, so the mayor is not able to commit to a study unilaterally, he needs the support of a majority of the Township Committee.

So I think that the title of the article is inflammatory, they are not "not committing", they want to get caught up with the rest of the mayors. At least, that's what I heard. Russ, you were there, did you hear the same thing?

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Russ Crespolini

7:56 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Hey John. Nice recap. No, I wouldn't categorize it all quite the same way you did. The verbiage the mayor used was he would not commit any funds until certain other conditions were met. Considering the DOE presentation ended with all of the mayors reiterating that they had gotten the approval of their councils to fund the study, the direct appeal was for Mayor Tolley to do the same.

That is not what happened. Mayor Tolley said he would not commit funds until certain other conditions were met.

Now certainly a headline that states, "Mendham Township Will Not Commit Funds For Feasibility Study Until They See What That Study Entails, Have increased Representation at the Meetings and Involve All the School Boards" would be unwieldy.

hahahahahahahahaha

I am being facetious here, but truthfully there are limits to what a headline can hold.

So the long and the short of it: Mendham Township won't commit the funds. Read further to find out why.

I don't know about the angle of needing to be caught up. That very well may be true.I am not sure how much the mayors kept Mayor Tolley in the loop.

Reply

Tracy Tobin

9:01 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Just to further clarify all the previous clarifications, Mayor Short (who is also a mayor in a municipality with Township Committee form of government) made it clear in his end of meeting summary that Boards of Education from all the affected towns have to be brought into the process of how to move foward. I am almost sure that another Mayor made the same point. Perhaps Mayor Tolley can post a list of his requirements for participating in a study. Perhaps there are some alternatives for the district that he will not consider under any circumstance or specific pre conditions for participating in the discussions. Right now I think we are all trying to understand what we think his township wants without hearing directly from him. No disrespect to the media, but sometimes they cannot provide the fullest presentation of all the points an individual is trying to make.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Russ Crespolini

8:54 am on Thursday, March 1, 2012

One of the nice perks of now having heard Mr. Tobin speak is that when I read his posts I can hear the dulcet tones and smooth bass tinged baritone. I swear he could order eggs with gravitas.

Of course I happen to have a very unappealing voice, which is why I write. Excellent points by all.

News is a discussion and I enjoy participating in it with you.

Reply

Jon Howard

10:54 pm on Thursday, March 8, 2012

Oh jeez. This is a Floating fat man township

Reply

Leave a comment