Mendham Twp. Committee Has 2 Options for Schools
The Mendham Township Committee selected two options for the regional school district feasibility study to bring back to the June 7 conclave. Will not commit funds until more information is available.
After a protracted discussion during Tuesday's meeting that lasted more than two hours, the Mendham Township Committee went through the list of options that came out of the West Morris Regional High School Mayors and Representatives of the Board of Education meeting and whittled their list of acceptable options down to two.
For some members, begrudgingly.
“Whatever we decide, it must be an option that has the best chance of being passed. We can’t frame it as all or nothing. When framed like that, many times the option is nothing,” Strobel said.
The complete list included the following, as ordered numerically by Mendham Township Mayor Sam Tolley.
1. Creation of 1 K-12 School District for all five towns
2. Creation of 2 K-12 Districts — one for Washington Township and one for the Mendhams and
Chesters
3. Creation of 1 K-12 District for Washington Township and a Limited Use 9-12 District for the
Mendhams and the Chesters. The K-8 schools in those towns would not change.
4. Status Quo: K-8 schools stay in place, WMMHS and WMCI-JS would continue as one district.
5. Creation of Magnet schools, either at the K-8 level and/or the High School 9-12
6. Hybrid Model: One Superintendent over all five towns, local school boards would remain in place and have local control over areas including quality of staff, curriculum and where their children attend school (needs further definition). The focus of this model is shared services, and optimization of resources while maintaining local schools.All of the options included funding formula alternatives and the financial implications of that option.
The discussion started off quickly with committeeman Frank Cioppetini who emphasized his position that the K-8 school districts were among the top in the state and should not be dismantled or combined with anyone.
“I don’t think our system is broken and I hate to see that system disrupted,”Cioppetini said. “I think that the presentations we had from the state and Vito Gagliardi showed us that the socioeconomic conditions in the community leads to the success of the school. We care about our kids, we have involved parents that will drive what we do. I favor a limited use 9-12 because I believe the socioeconomic data will show if you continue to have the socioeconomic conditions vary it will hurt our kids.”
Rob Strobel took the position that while none of the options were perfect, the committee needed to realistically look at what could be passed.
“For the state to let a change like this pass there needs to be an educational benefit or operational efficiency. It can’t be just an end run around the funding formula,” Strobel said. “We need options.”
Strobel, Rick Merkt and Maribeth Thomas all discarded Magnet Schools and Hybrid districts. But Merkt in particular took exception with the status quo option.
“We currently have a subsidy situation and studying a status quo option is extending that. Why spend money on the study to keep things the way they are?” Merkt said. “The status quo option is not ok. Our flexibility in looking at it as a baseline or at it related to a funding formula change should not be misconstrued as acceptance of it as an option.”
Spending money on the study was something that Mendham Township had not committed to doing, and as of Tuesday’s meeting they still had not committed their $10,000. Thomas had suggested that Tolley approach the board of education on splitting the cost.
“As full partners I would have hoped that they would,” Tolley said. “But they did not offer and I chose not to make an issue out of it.”
The process, as outlined by the new regional committee, would have the options needing unanimous approval by the Mayors in order to move forward with a feasibility study. Each Mayor (municipality) would then agree to commit $10,000 for the study. All the other participating towns set aside money in their 2012 budgets for the study.
As the discussion wound down, Cioppetini wanted to make sure the committee would be able to see what options were chosen before voting on spending money on the study and that their level of representation be addressed.
“We only have one vote out of nine. We need to have proper representation for our children,” Cioppetini said. “We can’t give control to other towns. It has been proven that when you don’t have control your school will lack.”
When Tolley went through the list a final time, options two and three were chosen.
2. Creation of 2 K-12 Districts — one for Washington Township and one for the Mendhams and Chesters
3. Creation of 1 K-12 District for Washington Township and a Limited Use 9-12 District for the Mendhams and the Chesters. The K-8 schools in those towns would not change.
Strobel cautioned the committee that they may have left themselves little room to maneuver with those choices.
“If you go for broke, you may end up broke.” Strobel said. “I am going to take one more swing at this and then I will abide by the decision of the group. We’ve picked two options. I want to go on the record. One that the state won’t approve and one that the people won’t approve.”
Merkt did agree that none of the options were perfect and that the answer most likely would lie with a compromise with all of the parties involved.
For his part, Tolley put it more succinctly.
“We have to deal with reality,” Tolley said.
DXJ
4:51 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Russ, nice job reporting this.
Domino
8:02 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
"We have to deal with reality".
When do you plan to start?
Jack Schrier
8:06 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
An incurable illness by the Township committee: paralysis by analysis.
Tracy Tobin
8:08 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Russ
A couple of typos but a good article. Must have been a fun meeting.
Linda Alexander
8:36 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
I'm speechless.
RGJ
7:06 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Rick said it is all about the money. Maybe. But an "I" district fighting with a "J" district about money, while the rest of New Jersey pays $900 million out of Newark's billion dollar school disaster, is like Inspector Clouseau hassling the organ grinder while the bank gets robbed in the background.
Also -- "Vito Gagliardi showed us that the socioeconomic conditions in the community leads to the success of the school.".....in the current insane structure, he should have finished. And it doesn't "lead" to it, it "reflects it". Mendham has a lot of the right answers, but it is in the person of resident Christie. Funding reform, school choice, teacher evaluations, and tether, I mean tenure, reform are what is needed. Those battles are being fought right now in Trenton.
The rest of this is just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Or maybe more like fighting for the lifeboats. Or maybe it is playing in the band as the ship sinks. I'll keep working on that analogy.
Anne Clark
8:14 am on Friday, June 1, 2012
Some information from yesterday's release of the School Report Cards from the DOE:
Mendham Twp per pupil K-8: $20,287
Mendham Bor per pupil K-8: $15,637
Chesters Bor/Twp per pupil K-8: $16,834
Wash.Twp. per pupil K-8: $16,296
West Morris Reg HS per pupil 9-12: $18,141
It is striking to me that those most concerned with spending at the high schools - residents of Mendham Township - are spending the most at the K-8 level, and 12% more than is spent per pupil 9-12. Must be some pretty incredible athletic and extracurricular programs for those kindergarteners!
LVMom
2:53 pm on Friday, June 1, 2012
so what it comes down to is that mendham/chester does not want long valley to be part of it's high school district. ... okay... does that mean long valley will drop IB, and focus on AP and the more then 90% in long valley not using IB?
--
so WHY is long valley paying $10,000? either way it's out... so make lv a k-12 district and let chester/mendham figure out what they want.
i love that mendham/chester pushes IB for it's global world view but wants to dump the 'poor' out of it's district because it's diverse and poor.
Claire
5:25 pm on Friday, June 1, 2012
Lvmom/laquin, why do you keep grouping a small group of medham township as the consensus.?
LVMom
2:56 pm on Friday, June 1, 2012
for the record option 5 and 6 were the BEST options for both towns economically and educationally... would have brought in money with magnet, and saved money with merging of staff... and would have created beter schools with magnet... bad choice to just dump them... works for so many AWSOME districts!