Good news for Gov. Chris Christie. Not only do a majority of New Jersey residents have a favorable few of the governor in the latest Fairleigh Dickinson University PublicMind poll, his numbers are up a healthy bit since last year.
Read FDU's full statement on the poll, and take our own poll at the bottom of this post to let us know what you think:
New Jerseyans, for the second survey in a row, say the state is headed in the right direction, a phenomenon not seen in eleven years of polling by Fairleigh Dickinson University’s PublicMind™. According to the most recent statewide survey, 50% say the state is headed in the right direction, while 41% say it’s on the wrong track. However, public employees do disagree: 50% of public employee households say the state is on the wrong track.
“This spring has not been marred by the same depth of bad feeling about funding schools as in past years,” said Peter Woolley, director of the poll. “Typically, spring means fights over school budgets followed by even more fights over the state’s next budget.”
A majority, 51% of voters, say they have a favorable view of Gov. Chris Christie, including 29% of voters in the opposite party. Only 37% of Garden State voters say their view of him is unfavorable. A year ago in May, Christie’s “favorables” were reversed, 40% favorable and 45 unfavorable.
In fact, 49% say he’s doing a “good” or “excellent” job, including 28% of Democrats who agree. “The good news is obvious,” said Woolley. “The bad news may be that, historically, the only way to go from here is down.”
At the same time, 56% of voters say they approve of the job the governor is doing, a new high for PublicMind polling of the governor’s performance: 33% disapprove. A year ago in May, the governor only broke even, with 44% approving and 44% disapproving.
Women approve by a margin of 9 points (48-39), and men by the much more robust margin of 37 points (64-27). Public employees disapprove of the governor (35-52), but non-public employees approve by a 2-to-1 margin (60-29).
The Fairleigh Dickinson University poll of 797 registered voters statewide was conducted by telephone with both landline and cell phones from April 30 through May 6, 2012, and has a margin of error of +/-3.5 percentage points.
This post is shared by Patch sites serving communities in Morris and Sussex counties. Responses below may be by readers of any of those sites.
roger freiday
7:41 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
The good out-weighs the bad MAYBE. Where Christie takes a dive to me, is his messing with the Highlands Council, and even WORSE is his goofy ''income tax'' cut. Typical G O P baloney to help the wealthy and ''connected'' and ignore the real inequity the PROPERTY TAX. (2% cap rule not-withstanding) What we need is comprehensive change of the school funding and NOT rely on property taxes, and forget that useless income tax reduction.
Prentiss Gray
8:52 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
A good political lesson here, keep your head down for a while and your numbers go up.
Dan Grant
8:58 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
The income tax cuts are just a recycled Whitman Plan that got us into so much trouble with property taxes. You are right. It is all about the cost of educating NJ's students resting on the back of Property Tax payers alone and the new November vote which eliminates the people's right to pass or fail a budget as long as the school budget stays under 2 percent increase is a ploy to look like you are doing something about property taxes. Even a 2 percent budget can have flaws that the people ought to be able to fail if they want to. We still have the local funding but have taken away a major tool in determining how local education is delivered. Christie is a Grandstander waiting for his next opportunity and he always was.
Nicolas Antonoff
12:15 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Agree that school budgets must be subject to direct voter control - also, when
rejected by the voters, school budgets must not be reversible by local municipal legislators. School boards are incompetent at setting budgets frequently exceeding fifty (50) million dollars and even more incompetent at dealing with NJEA local tribes . When budgets are voted down the school boards must be held to the previous year's budget. There should be no waivers to the 2 percent cap except for increases in enrollment over one (1) percent. As a general rule, the school districts should be made to live within the state DoE assigned adequacy budget. Ideally, education should be consolidated (county level?) ,state run and funded by the income tax (save 60 percent of property tax levy). Requirements must not be a hodge podge of local fantasies with little bearing on real word needs.
Nicolas Antonoff
V
9:09 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
I'll grant him that, the Big Guy is a political genius. In a state literally owned (and almost ruined) by the Democrats, he has wrung a number of major concessions out of them, while reversing his favorability numbers in the process. If he campaigns for Gov. Romney, possibly (though not likely) joins him on the ticket, and succeeds in flipping New Jersey red in November, he is a shoe-in for 2020.
Carla DeWitt
10:14 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Christie is a bully and an embarrassment to our state.
sher stec
10:35 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
I totally agree!
Gadfly
10:43 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Agreed.
CR
5:14 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Couldn't agree more!
Susan M.
8:56 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
I totally agree. He says that the "Jersey Shore" gives the state a bad rap. He is no different from Snooki and her gang -- rude and demeaning to those that disagree with him.
buddy
3:23 pm on Monday, May 21, 2012
Agreed. It's hypocritical that any anti bullying legislation was condoned by him. There are ways to get work done without sacrificing people's reputations.
Barbara
10:18 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
If we want to fix property taxes, we need to address the main driver of those costs - education. Senator Michael Doherty has a bill, Fair School Funding, which would fund each child across the State at the same amount of money - as the NJ Constitution requires (not this baloney about "thorough and efficient, which came from the Courts). That would require the wasteful and bloated urban districts to be more responsible for their own spending, which would be the best thing we could do to lower property taxes. Clearly, the present school funding has failed both the children AND the taxpayers.
J
4:55 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Actually, Barbara, the words, "thorough and efficient" are a direct quote from the State Constitution; they were not invented by some judges, as you seem to believe. Whether the current framework actually promotes T&E is open to (considerable) question.
Legs2
12:25 am on Thursday, May 10, 2012
Right on Barbara. Why is not the Gov behind Doherty's bill if he is so interested in getting taxes on track? What is being done in NJ is neither Thorough nor Efficient. We need leadership in Trenton and nominations to the courts that have read and understand the State and Federal Constitutions. If past courts have over stepped, let new courts who understand their job descriptions reverse bad law. Where is the Gov's leadership? Where are nominees who have backgrounds in Constitutional Law?
Patriot
10:24 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Governor Christie should put his Town Hall meetings on hold for awhile and tend to that New Jersey Benefit Health Exchange Bill that has been sitting on his desk since sometime in March. The Governor should VETO the damn thing. The people of NJ do not want this evil framework of Obamacare to be established. Cut the legs out from this and bury it forever. Governor DO YOUR JOB!!
Douglas Vliet
10:52 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
I support the GOV becuz he know that if he cuts taxes on everyone and cuts business costs, corporations will return to our state instead of Fleeing like they were under previous Democratic administrations. People forget that the rich and corporations have the means to move anywhere they like to avoid taxes.
Dan Grant
11:16 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Rich Corporations (who are getting richer BTW) are not leaving NJ because of taxation. When they do leave it is because they find cheaper labor. You have bought into the line that lower taxes mean more jobs. That is just not true. Look at the Cover of Forbes showing the 16 percent increase in profits by the top 500 companies. These Companies are run the the expectations of Wall St. not the advantage of America. It is only the middle class that is expected to sacrifice wages, give up their young for war and degrade education for their children.
Jerry
11:29 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Chris Christi has taught that the Governorship requires attention to DETAIL. We have not had one Governor, to my recollection, that has done as much homework! Future Governors should take a lesson from this one..." The devil is in the details"
Cara DePalma
11:50 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
I'm sure Mr. Christie will be doing a nationwide victory lap on these numbers, yet NJ still lags behind NY, PA and CT in job growth, property taxes are still highest in the US, state employees are still double dipping on salary and pensions, still getting obscene sick-time payouts and this guys is a hero for taking on the NJEA? And what are the people of NJ getting out of the $225 million tax credit to Prudential for moving around the corner in Newark? Now go on and campaign for Mitt and Walker and the others and tout how "great" NJ is doing...
Douglas Vliet
12:05 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Dan I don't believe in your strictly liberal Democratic talking points. I know where you are coming from. I believe that Gov, Christie is following the Reagan model and that is one that I know works. During Reagan Tax cuts increased money money in the US treasury becuz of increased economic activity. With Obama's policies we have a stagnant economy and tax funds to the treasury are down. Record unemployment when you consider the Labor Force Participation Rate. Obama's policies are anti-capitalist in spite of what he claims.
Dan Grant
1:51 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Not that this has anything to do with the topic of property taxes but.....
From CCN Money, Reagan could never have made it through this year's Republican Primary.
Reagan was certainly a tax cutter legislatively, emotionally and ideologically. But for a variety of political reasons, it was hard for him to ignore the cost of his tax cuts," said tax historian Joseph Thorndike.
Two bills passed in 1982 and 1984 together "constituted the biggest tax increase ever enacted during peacetime," Thorndike said.
All told, the tax increases Reagan approved ended up canceling out much of the reduction in tax revenue that resulted from his 1981 legislation.
Annual federal tax receipts during his presidency averaged 18.2% of GDP, a smidge below the average under President Carter -- and a smidge above the 40-year average today.
Patriot
12:10 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Yes, the devil is in the details.
New jersey has become the Poster State for Agenda 21 under Governor Christie!
Just examine "the details" of the NJ development and redevelopment plan AKA ....
THE NJ STATE STATEGIC PLAN. Under this plan the American Dream of homeownership will be abolished, cars will be outlawed and you will have bikes to pedal to work. You will be nudged into stack and pack housing in an urban area ( like a rat in a cage),work at a job locally, walk to work, eat the food you are allowed to eat,...And cease to think for youself, but still pay your taxes to BIG BROTHER! This STATE PLAN is AN Agenda 21 OFFERING and the NJ TAXPAYERS DO NO WANT IT! Examine the details of the Foreclosure Plan".....using the foreclosed homes for affordable housing. Literally giving houses to felons, drug users, people who cannot afford them, etc at the taxpayers expense. Totally a REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH.....but it is our wealth...THE TAXPAYERS OF NJ! Don't give us the baloney of Social Justice or some other sob story as a foil for your socialist agenda. We, the people abhor what you are attempting to do to OUR REPUBLIC. Where are you Governor Christie????? If you are not a closet Rhino or Socialist why are you not standing up against these appalling assaults on our sovereignty and our freedom?
Yes, the devil is in the details!
RGJ
12:59 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
If you remove the citizens who wouldn't be allowed to serve on a jury due to direct personal financial interest in his state employee stancess, I do not see how anyone could watch this speech from last week and not admire Christie, at least personally:
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/22315987#utm_campaign=www.njspotlight.com&utm_source=22315987&utm_medium=social
Kevin Nedd
3:17 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
It's easy to not admire a Governor who promised to LOWER property taxes while running for office, when in reality property tax bills has been higher each year throughout his this tenure.
Douglas Vliet
7:55 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Well Dan there never was a budget surplus during the Clinton years becuz all they did was borrow from the social security trust fund and move the money around to make it appear there was a surplus. 2. I would never trust CNN money as a source.
Kevin Nedd
8:58 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Clinton’s large budget surpluses owe much to the Social Security tax on payrolls. Social Security taxes brought in more than the cost of benefits at that time and the "Social Security surplus" made the total deficit or surplus figures look better than they should have if Social Security wasn’t counted. But even if we remove Social Security from the equation, there was a surplus of $1.9 billion in fiscal 1999 and $86.4 billion in fiscal 2000. So any way you count it, the federal budget was balanced and a surplus did result, if only for a while.
AgEnders NJ
3:59 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Governor Christie could do a lot more than he is to help business create jobs in this state. Taxes are the almost the highest in the country -- and the US has the highest corporate taxes in the world. He is all for redistributing wealth through statist solutions. He should not only veto the health care exchanges, but also the foreclosure transformation act. Then he needs to uphold the law in the executive branch and remind his office of planning just what the state planning act says, and that they have to start over since they did not vote within the mandatory 60 days after the last public comment event. Then, Christie could distance himself from the carbon trading gimmick and the windmills-off-the-coast boondoggle near Atlantic City. Billions spent for expensive and unsustainable so-called "green" jobs which do nothing but steal taxpayer money with endless subsidies and bonding/rebonding. Christie needs to get prosecutors in to uncover the thievery in the state lottery system and state pension system, etc. Just as a start. Eliminate that, then the state could save some real money.
Ian Gratton
8:39 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Governor Chris Christie is a RHINO (Republican In Name Only). He is doing a horrible job protecting the citizens of New Jersey from Unconstitutional legislation being forced down our throats by the federal government. Over the last 4 years there have been multiple pieces of Unconstitutional Tyrannical legislation that have been passed in Congress by "both" sides of the isle, and Christie still refuses to evoke the 10 amendment and push for the Nullification of these bills, especially Obamacare, and The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which has provisions in it that allow the president to have the military arrest and detain indefinitely with no rights to habeas corpus, any American citizens considered a threat to America, more notebly the government. The classifications though, of who is considered a terrorist are so vague that if you are stockpiling food you could be considered a terrorist. If you speak out against the government too often you could be labeled a terrorist. Are we living in America anymore more because it sure doesn't feel like it to me. It feels more like Communist Russia for God's sakes!!! Governor Christie is a blowhard. He talks tough, but he's nothing more than left of center loyalist to whatever the federal government forces on us and I will never again take part in the election game set up by both parties where we are forced to chose between the lesser of two evils. Screw the establishments on both sides!!!
Nullify Now!!! 10th Amendment!!!
Richard Zuendt
6:17 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
If you care to learn a little bit more about Governor Christie I would recommend reading this series: http://conservativenewjersey.com/the-myth-of-christie-conservatism-intro
Politics with a conscience
12:01 am on Thursday, May 10, 2012
Christie appears to be doing well having bureaucrats plan the future of NJ behind closed doors (with the help of their chosen stakeholders). We expected different.
I wish Christie knew the limits of government.
Let developers fund development. Let people develop their own property. Then they will develop where needed. If you encourage development in certain areas, and curtail development in others you force changes to property values.
Christie has minions planning the future of NJ (what happened to freedom?) and has been appointing Sharia(sp?) friendly judges. Can he at least veto the healthcare and foreclosure crap coming down the pike? We can't afford to pay for the crap NJ is paying for already. GIVE US A BREAK!!! Don't crater our property values and take the value out of the last asset we have.
Gov.? Do you even know what Agenda 21 is? Liberal money pandering at the cost of America. Giving up our assets and our freedom for us. "Sustainable" is NOT sustainable.
Can you veto the Healthcare exchanges? We don't need a healthcare exchange. We need the cheapest insurance that covers our needs. Simple works best. Cut the crap.
Can Christie veto the Foreclosure act? Using my tax dollars to buy my neighbors house is plain ludicrous. The low sale price lowers property values in the neighborhood, and putting something other than a competent care-taking neighbor in the house will further lower property values nearby.
Legs2
12:37 am on Thursday, May 10, 2012
The state of New Jersey has passed legislation to join several other states in kowtowing to the Obama Administration by implementing a statewide exchange. These federally-regulated "exchanges" will replace the individual market in health care with crony collusion between insurance companies and bureaucrats. Tell the Gov to veto this bill.
States shouldn't waste money preparing and launching potentially unconstitutional provisions of the health law.
While some have argued that states should launch their own exchanges in order to mitigate ObamaCare's effects, these compliant states will be disappointed when they find they've only aided and abetted a federal top-down takeover.
ObamaCare says: 'An Exchange may not establish rules that conflict with or prevent the application of regulations promulgated by the Secretary [of Health and Human Services (HHS)].'
Make no mistake about it, the exchanges will be federally controlled. Have you ever noticed how many people in the insurance business are connected in one way or another to government?
Have you ever noticed how many people connected to the insurance business are also connected to politics at one level or another?
dm
11:53 am on Thursday, May 10, 2012
in the next four years, he wants teachers to pay 29% out of their salary for health insurance
Cara DePalma
3:27 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
I say lead by example! I guess he doesn't realize, if he had to shop for health care, that Obamacare would prevent insurers from denying him coverage due to the preexisting condition of obesity. I say this not as an insult, but as a matter of fact. But I guess he'll have his taxpayer supported health care for life so what does he care?
Kevin Nedd
3:14 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
Evaluating Christie should be simple. As a candidate for governor Christie explicitly stated he would LOWER property taxes. There should be no debate on this. Every vote should now ask, are my property taxes any less than they were before Christie assumed office? This isn't rocket science.
Cara DePalma
3:24 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
Christie put the 2% cap on increases, but knew NJ couldn't really do without the tax revenue so he left it up to municipalities to raise taxes beyond 2% so technically your taxes aren't his fault. It's intellectual dishonesty, or as the GOP calls it, par for the course.
Richard Zuendt
4:05 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
Christie never said he would lower property taxes. He can't since they are set at the local level.
Cara DePalma
4:23 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
My apologies Richard, you're right. He promised to maintain the property tax rebates, which he broke in his first six months as governor.
Kevin Nedd
4:55 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
Here is what Christie said with respect to property taxes on his 2009 campaign website:
"New Jersey has the highest tax burden in the country and it’s getting worse - the latest Corzine budget just raised taxes by another $1.2 billion. We’re also burdened with the highest property taxes in the country, but that didn't stop Jon Corzine from taking away property tax rebates from 1.2 million New Jerseyans in this year’s budget. In fact, Jon Corzine and Jim McGreevey have raised taxes on the average New Jersey family by more than $10,000 since 2002 – over $22 billion in taxes, the highest in the nation. In all, Corzine and Governor McGreevey have raised over 100 taxes on New Jersey’s hardworking families.
This will change in a Christie Administration. New Jersey’s hard-working middle-class families can no longer handle the weight of these out of control taxes. The first step to reversing New Jersey's declining economic climate and giving New Jerseyans a little relief is by cutting property taxes.
Provide Property Tax Relief
The last thing Chris will do is to follow Corzine's lead in eliminating property tax rebates for 1.2 million New Jerseyans. The rebate currently is the only property tax relief we have, and it provides much needed, meaningful help while we put in place other reforms. We keep the rebate in place to give taxpayers some breathing room in these tough economic times."
THIS SOUNDS A LOT LIKE PROMISING TO CUT PROPERTY TAXES TO ME!
Richard Zuendt
4:45 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
Cara: If you go to the website I co-founded you will find out I am no Christie fan, but I also do not believe in a person being blamed for something that he never said. No he never promised to maintain property tax rebates. Here are his promises on taxes from his 88 ways. I will have to put it in two comments because of character limits on the Patch:
CUTTING TAXES
1. Thirty Three:
I will cut New Jersey’s income taxes across the board for all taxpayers. Our tax rates are oppressive and are driving residents out of state. No more.
2. Thirty Four:
I will encourage investment and expansion of New Jersey-based small businesses by offering an additional income tax cut for those who derive business income from New Jersey-based small businesses.
Richard Zuendt
4:45 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
Cara: Secon part
3. Thirty Five:
I will reduce the corporate business tax rate to give New Jersey businesses a competitive advantage. With our tax rates among the highest of our neighboring states, reducing the corporate business tax rate will create a better business climate with which to attract private sector investment to New Jersey.
4. Thirty Six:
I will eliminate the “double-taxation” on New Jersey’s S-Corporations for the 80,000 taxpayers currently paying the corporation “minimum” tax, putting our state in line with the other 47 states and federal government which have implemented this policy.
5. Thirty Seven:
I will eliminate the hidden “investment tax” on New Jersey-based businesses which acts as a penalty for businesses for being based in New Jersey. Instead of being taxed for only the amount of sales in New Jersey, the “investment tax” also factors in the level of investment (i.e., real estate, payroll, etc.) a company has in New Jersey. I will immediately reverse this.
Richard Zuendt
4:50 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
Cara:
If you want real property tax CUTS the only way that will happen is when the state constitution is respected by both the supreme court and the legislature. The constitution says that ALL of the income tax revenue must be used for property tax relief. The way that should be done is via school funding. If every school child in the state was treated equally by spending the same amount per student by the state, property taxes for over 85% of the home owners in the state could be CUT by 25% or more. There is a bill in Trenton that would do this, the Fair School Funding Plan. If you tell me which town you live in, I can tell you exactly how much your town would get back in funding. It will amaze you!
Cara DePalma
5:00 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
Thank you for your posts and reasonable discourse. it took me by surprise, which is a sad statement on our current political atmosphere. I live in Wharton.
Kevin Nedd
4:59 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
Richard,
Christie did promise to cut property taxes by maintaining rebates (see my post above). You need to do an etch-a-sketch reset!
Richard Zuendt
5:11 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
A rebate is NOT a property tax cut. A cut is in the rate you pay, at the time you pay. A rebate is something you get when you pay the full price and then get a portion back. Note the use of property tax "relief" in Christie statement. It might sound like a property tax cut to a person who does not know the definition of a tax cut and a tax rebate.
By the way, the "Property Tax Cut" plan being offered is the same type of deception that the rebate program is. You will pay the full rate and then wait till the end of the year to find out what percentage (if any) you will be able to deduct from your state income tax.
Kevin Nedd
5:24 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
As a former committeeman in my township (Finance Chair), I am fully aware of the difference between a cut and a rebate. But let us focus on Christie's words: "Property Tax Relief". Where is the "Property Tax Relief" Christie promised when he ran for office in 2009? When I look at my net property taxes paid over the past three years. EACH YEAR HAS BEEN GREATER THAN THE YEAR BEFORE. WHERE IS THE RELIEF!!!
Kevin Nedd
5:27 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
Richard,
No matter how you try and spin it. Christie's proMISE to provide "Property Tax Relief" has been an EPIC FAIL!
Richard Zuendt
5:14 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
Cara:
Wharton would get back $2,104,121 for the local school system. Which high school does Wharton send their children to and I can tell you how much they would get.
Richard Zuendt
5:41 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
KMN:
Once again, a tax rebate is not a tax cut. His property tax relief was the cap. You now have the relief of not being responsible for anything over that 2%. The tax payers themselves would have to vote to increase it. And who is responsible for the property tax increasing each year? The town council, plain and simple. So you only have yourself to blame for those tax increases.
Kevin Nedd
5:56 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
Nice try Richard.
I guess you missed this sentence, which I quoted from Christie’s website: "The first step to reversing New Jersey's declining economic climate and giving New Jerseyans a little relief is by cutting property taxes."
That’s not a promise to put in a 2% cap. That's a promise to cut what I am paying now to something LESS. Had he promised to cut the growth of property taxes, something I promised and did as a committeeman (11% to 2%) I would buy your argument. But as it stands, this remains an EPIC FAIL on Christie's part.
Kevin Nedd
6:04 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
BTW, I agree with you Christie has no way of keeping his promise of "cutting property taxes". This however doesn't mean he gets a pass for making a promise he knew he couldn't keep in the first place. Especially one that had a lot with him getting elected.
Richard Zuendt
6:12 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
Nice try to KMN
The line you quote says "giving New Jerseyans a little relief is by cutting property taxes" does not say it was something he could do or that he promised; just something that would be nice in the current economic climate.
In his 88 ways to change New Jersey he listed 5 things he was going to do regarding taxes. Not one of them had to do with property taxes. Say what you want, he never promised a property tax cut since he, as the governor of the state, has no control over property tax rates.
Kevin Nedd
6:58 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
Richard,
Not having control over something has never stopped a politicial figure like Christie from making a campaign promise, he knew he could not keep. We'll agree to disagree on this one and let voters decide if they want to hold his feet to the fire.
Richard Zuendt
7:44 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
KMN,
If you go to the website conservativenewjersey.com you will find that there is no love lost between me and Christie. With that said though I do not remember one time that he specifically said he or his administration would cut property taxes. His handlers were always very careful not to allow him to say anything that would come back to haunt him.
By the way, what town do you live in and I will tell you exactly how much more money you would get back if Fair School Funding became the law.
Kevin Nedd
7:58 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
Your situation with Christie makes no difference to me. I can read and interpret what appeared on Christie's website during the heat of a close campaign. Christie promised to cut property taxes. These exact words appear on his website. He is accountable. You might except the spin, I don't.
Kevin Nedd
8:03 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
Btw, the GOP campaign chairperson in my township is on record as saying Christie would cut property taxes if elected.
Kevin Nedd
8:08 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
Lastly, back when Christie made the promise in 2009, I pointed out on my website, that this was a promise he could not keep, because it was out of his control. The GOP in my township insisted he would live up to the promise. So much so that I have a hand shake agreement with the Republican Party Chairmain in my township to personally endorse Christie in my local paper if my property taxes do indeed go down.
Richard Zuendt
9:30 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
KMN:
The GOP campaign chairperson's statement is hearsay as far as I am concerned. And again, I have no source of him ever saying he could cut property taxes.
I think the man personally is a fraud. Go to our website, conservative new jersey and read the piece about Christie (on the right side). But with that said, I have to defend a person when he is attacked for something he never said.
Again, what town are you in and I can give you an idea of just how much money would be returned to it if you would help support the only plan that will give a true property tax CUT!
Kevin Nedd
9:40 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
Richard,
I don't need to hear him say it. What appeared on his website is enough for me. You may not interpret what appeared the way I do and that's your prerogative. I know what I read and what the message was his campaign tried to convey. Christie promised to lower property taxes. Period.
Richard Zuendt
9:50 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
KMN
And Christie never said a "Property Tax Cut" and that is period. He never promised to lower property taxes. Say what you want, it is not true.
Kevin Nedd
11:03 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
A QUOTE FROM CHRISTIE'S CAMPAIGN WEBSITE:
"The first step to reversing New Jersey's declining economic climate and giving New Jerseyans a little relief is by cutting property taxes."
WHAT IDEA DO YOU THINK HE WAS TRYING TO CONVEY TO VOTERS?
You may not have gotten the impression he was promising to cut property taxes, but I know a number of voters who stated this was the main reason they voted for Christie.
Richard Zuendt
9:20 am on Saturday, May 12, 2012
KMN
And in that quote he does not say he can or will do it. He does not say, "if elected governor I will cut you property taxes". And the reason he did not say that is because he knew he could not do it. It is that simple.
Kevin Nedd
11:15 am on Saturday, May 12, 2012
I have no doubt you believe what you are saying.
Mike
11:17 pm on Monday, May 14, 2012
Outsource all testing and teaching to Pearson. $10/hr, no benefits, and if you don't like it, work at Walmart. Problem solved!
Patriot
3:17 pm on Monday, May 21, 2012
Governor Christie, is a progressive who believes in Big Government. He is ,implementing the same Obamaesque plans and techniques that are engineered to destroy OUR REPUBLIC and Our Way Of LIfe. AGENDA 21 concepts are now mirrored in the NJ STATE PLAN.
People read up on both plans and see how they superimpose on one another.
Don't believe what you are being told. Look below the surface. We the American people are being sold out by both parties. WAKE UP!